/avesatanas/ - Hail Satan and All Ancients

lol go die to satan

>What about the Monk?

>Have not Monks found peace?

>Does not peace exist for the Monk, and only the Monk?

Let us examine these questions, these propositions that peace must retain a state of differentiation by which we call War 'war' and peace 'peace'. We shall take a holy monk and place this monk in several environments. It shall not matter what type of Monk; perhaps, the most Holy Monk ever, or a Monk pursuing the serenity of peacefulness. Nameless, without any denomination; the Monk exists as a paragon of wonder. Thus, we shall place the Monk in an environment where the Monk exists in a popular and bustling world; then the Monk shall be examined in an empty world, upon a planet all by its lonesome. Then, we shall strip the Monk of his bodily frames and place the Monk as a form of Consciousness. Finally, we shall make the Monk Immortal, asking, always, in every situation- does the Monk find peace, or is War - conflict - and the Monk always at one?

In the first scenario, our precious and dear Monk, existing in a world of others, in a bustling city or, even, in the outreaches and the skirts of the country-side, does the Monk ever find peace? In a world where the Monks sacred Mount of Peace needs to withstand the deviations, distractions, impulses, and instincts of other persons and worldly distractions, the only means by which the monk can escape conflict, a place where the Monk can exist without waging Death, Blasphemy, and War, is a place void of all human interactions. Yet even in such a zone, empty of commerce or communication with the World, still exists as opposed to the World, and thus, even in solitude, the Monk-in-World functions as its divergence. For in a city or in transition among the people, the Monk must determine, for themself, not to fall susceptible the persuasions of the world; thus, the Monk-in-world is actively blaspheming against the ruling structures, the ruling concepts which govern the social conditions in which the Monk operates. The Monk must seek, upon his sacred throne, the Death of the World; the World ceases to exist as a crystalized form, and becomes a liquidized functionality- an operative mechanism that exists for utility. The Monk has killed the World by depriving it of the Life which it offers to the Monk; the Monk-in-world caPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

If anything is specific outside of its definition, Satanism isn't a path for everyone. It's a path that stares deeply into the Abyss and willingly embraces the Shadows while observing/presencing the Eternal Black Flame. Even in the purely spiritual and eclectic Adversarial paths, some which are Gnostic, some of which are Diabolic, some which are truly Sinister, there exists a sense of balance within dynamic expressions of one's potential. One could surmise that Satanism thusly provides a sense of balance; however, this is mostly true within the logic of a given Adversarial system, given Adversarialism's inherent cultivation of conflict and opposition and resistance through the analysis of applied Questions to any statement.

This brings up an interesting question:

>What is Satanism, and what does it mean?

In all of my studies, and I have come across many types, I have come to the conclusion of viewing "Satanism" as, rather than any specific branch or philosophy, as a collection of philosophico-religious, sociological and genealogical systems underneath the stratum of Satan as a Being with any centralized focus or emphasis upon worship. It is very helpful to know that simply because one utilizes Lucifer and/or Satan, they are not a Luciferian/Satanist; indeed, there are many demonologists who utilize the entities Lucifer/Satan within the capacity of their Holy Faces as they are known within a specific tradition from which their figures are derived. Within the very broad spectrum of Satanism, there are: rationalists, pure empiricists, theists, hidden/open traditionalist covens/families, diabolists, gnostics, spiritualists, atheists, edgelords, and pure symbolists.

LaVeyan Satanism is a type of symbolic Satanism, as is the modern-day Satanic Temple; both are types which favor rationalism and empirical models, whereas TST leans more heavily towards the prominence of reason and dismisses concepts like magic, and whereas the CoS celebrates the Satanic elect, who arise in their stations by one reason or another, in terms of social elite-Darwinism, while recognizing magical structures, yet insist upon a purely subjective criteria for calling one's self a Satanist: for the CoS, a "real Satanist" is not one who worships a real Satan, but who recognizes thPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

To think about a thing is to not simply think about any single thing, but about a selection of things, which can then fluctuate and transition based upon associated relationships of (ex-)/(in-)clusivity. Even in those moments of nothingness, what one contemplates is a moment of something-ness, a space of Anti-ness, an ever-shifting variation of what is or what isn't. Thus, to think is not to simply think, but to envision an entire assemblage of (dis-)orderliness. In the spaces of being, we can therefore point to the aspects of spaces, or spatial conditional extensions which connect to a given lineage of potentia within any given variable. Even in the anchoring of finality, there exists a categorical quintessence.

Contemplatively, one can envision this signifies an eternity of momentariness. If every functionality has within itself an infinite potential, one can theoretically predict an entire system based upon any single conjunction. Akin to the infinite monkeys on a typewriter theoretical session, every moment has within itself an endless infinity of shifting variation. To think about a thing, therefore, is to align consciousness with conditional existential variations. Certain moments seem absolute. Yet even the surety of a moment is questionable, for if every moment is itself an extension of potential, then every being is itself an extension of Potentia. And if every being is an extension of Potentia, then the very concept of knowledge is uncertain, and only rests within the conditional elements of a certain specificity. What is true in this realm may not be true in another realm. To see truth, therefore, is to understand not truth, but a lineage of systems of relationships upon which truth is said to exist, a principle raised upon the skulls and bones of previous dissidence.

To know is to be certain that knowledge is, in itself, an uncertainty, but claimed through framing idealizations of perception into digestible formation. This is not to say that knowledge nor objectivity nor subjectivity exists- only that these conditional elements are, themselves, existent upon an eternal system of systems upon systems.

In the most basic categories, every function has, at minimum, three modalities of (non-)existence: the absolute, the negative, and the variance. We could call this, "The Is", "The Is-Not", and "The Could-be". If we were to give it a sign of sorts: A, Not-A, & A(V). Another label, the one most applicable, is that every modality can be labeled "True", "False", "Variance". One can note that every function operates out of this triadic operationality: A thing is, is-not, and can be. Another, more esoteric note one can make, is that every not-T is, conceivably, a form of variance, but an instance of Not-T is also one of modular certainty within any expression that recognizes T as certitude. Therefore, while a thing can be Is and Is-not, such as "This statement is false", a form outside of normative T, yet sharing F or also T, modifies itself towards variance. While it is a stretch to say every non-thing is therefore a variance, it can also be consistent with a modular expression that views every Not-Is as a state that is an extension of other conditions which would allow that state to exist in coherency given other situated vectors.

If we consider A to Z, one must conceive, most immediately, of -A, or Not-A. A is not B. So every B is a Not-A. C is not A. So every C is Not-A. While B & C exist as Not-A, they also exist as A-V. Thus, B-Z, on an individual relation, are Not-A, and on both individual and collective notions, A(V). Every expression must operate out of these three primary modes: A thing Is, Is-Not, Is-Type. Even if a thing Is and Is-Not or any mixture thereof, it is an Is-Type. To therefore contemplate any endeavor, one must consider that which one sees, that which one can envision, and that which one cannot see. Since every expression is a relational series of consequential conditional states, any action must be taken into consideration of these practicalities. Even if one commits irrationality to an action, there still exists a series of consequential relational conditions. The loss of logical constraints does not deter the existence of any function from having expression. Even the inexpressible has its function as that which expression is unable to pontificate.

Let us consider a box of laundry detergent with the name Laundo. Laundo is not laundry detergent; Lando is the nominative state includedPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

In every step we take, in every breath, in every moment, the echoes of the energies of the omniverse flows throughout the All; every area has the residual reflections and contemplative projections of the (non-)choice and the (non-)thought. Even in the barren lands of nothingness lays energies, both dormant and active; although their visionary presence may not be felt, it may be seen; or if not seen, then felt; and if not felt nor seen, then presenced or functionally produced qua the strands interconnecting the All in a spider web of dynamic energies, all of which relies upon some mechanism or another to envision, touch, and/or embody. To see the echoes, one must simply listen and go beyond the structures of constraint and brashness towards the conduction of contemplative actualization.

By following the strands of the Sacred Spider, one can see the ever-verdant relations of interconnectedness upon which all things reside. Even the outside is defined by that which is not inside. To therefore transcend this constraint, one steps upon the brilliant jade webs to bear Witness to the Divinity that resides within All. The echoes of the eternal Fire burns empowered by the motion of the Wind, flowing with the swaying by the Water, strengthened or tamed by the temperance of Earth. Every footstep carries a thousand steps in both direction; every function has its variation and absolution and negation. The Whispers of the Divine move throughout every touch, emanating through sight and sound and by memory; through thought, reason, madness, passion, the echoes of a moment expands in the now, in the then, and in the shall or might or naught.

Structure governed by telos exposed to structure without telos; there is Life in Death and there is Death in Life. Nature's voice sings through every action; in every thought, in every moment, in every song, the eternal Echoes of the Divine are. When one sees, they hear and when one hears, they see. Latent energies, primal primordialities, affluent presences - they are all existent within any space. One must only look hard enough. When one can Witness, then one Becomes.

As my steps move, so may my breath become One with Thee

As the Echoes whisper, so may Thy Hands surround me

Shield me, hold me, be my Divine Guide

In Thy Divine and Sacred Essence

As my feet travel in this road, I ask and pray of Thee, guide and direct me into Thy Divinity

May my every breath be consumed of Thy Sight

May my voice be composed of Thy every Word

In nomine dei nostri Luciferi excelsi

Ave Satanas

Though the Fires scar and sear my Flesh

I embrace the Divine Flames!

Burn in the Fiery Void of Primordiality!

For these trials, ever endless, are the songs of the Universes which dance between All

Feet heavy, burden of thousand thoughts, weighed down by millions of bags

Happiness, sadness, whirling thoughts

Pride, strength, immortal Fire never dissolving

Determination, a Divine Hammer, Eternal Cultivation

Ever-lasting Sun, All-Echo of the Moon, endless Portals

pathways form, eyes forward, hand raised

Armor, Shield, Sword

Ave Satanas!

Ave Lucifer!

Ave Lilith!

Ave Hecate!

Ave Belial!

Ave Asmodeus!

Ave Naamah!

Ave Eris!

Ave Aphrodite!

Ave Hecate!

Ave Pan!

Ave Gullveig!

Ave Ones of the Chaos!

Ave Princes! Ave Princesses!

Ave Divine Ancients!

Ave the Primordial Essence!

My Eyes shall be Thine! My feet shall be Thine! My heart shall beat of Thee!

My Soul Burns with the Divine Flame, my Song weaves that of the All-Nothing, my presence infused with Thee

In Glorium

Ave

Oh Divine Ones

I beseech of Thee

Grant upon me a focus, Divine

Aid me, show me Thy Path

Bestow upon me Thy Divine Light and Eternal Flame

Hail The Ancient Ones

Ave Satanas

Divine Primordiality, emerging from the All-None, is present within All-One, manifesting within the All in land, in causality, and within acausal being. All realms are existent. The entire realm of existence is a playground of consciousness; for how can knowledge be certain except for our own belief? And in this, even existence must face the Divine Question and even certainty must be identified as a strict form of "I believe."

LOTOR systematizing is as real as any other religious model and religiously accessible to a system which orders itself in accordance with certain mythologies, such as Christian Demonology and the Rostock Tablet and Christian Clergy members who practiced a form of Holy Necromancy. The gods, deities, entities, forces, and powers of LOTOR are as real as the Spirits and Gods and Deities which teach man wisdom through the various religious systems implemented within our space-time localities. Every realm, every system, every God and Goddess is real, accessible and exists in a realm of the All-One. I call this "Potentia", which is short-hand for:

>'endless potential realities and possibilities (non)existent within the stratum of Being'

Secondly, Satan is not simply a semiotic signifier. Satan is real. Satan exists. yhvh also exists. These individuals are not as existent as they are represented, but must be understood within the meta-narratives of spiritual politics existent within the stratum of being. In this way, archaeologically speaking, yhvh is traceable to Canaanite deities, which reflects the spiritual politics of the ancient world: after the tribalist animalists created systems, polytheists rose to power; in a time of polytheism, monotheism gave fanaticism a focal point, while enabling alterable systems, seen within Abrahamism, of minute accessible myths (e.g., Kabala, Christian Demonological syncretism, the Munich Manual, Islamic genies and jins). Ergo, in the lineage of Clayborn materia, any objective lens upon history notes that "yhvh" is a singular storm god's deification into an absolute in order to generate a gathering localization which posited as a revolutionary force of change, which means that Satan is a multifaceted Entity:

1) Satan is a singular mode of a God/Goddess who/which outright opposes the entity yhvh (*although some judaic functionaPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

Satan genuinely exists, present within an accessible simultaneously triadic state:

1) As a genuine Entity(s) that opposes the abrahamic storm god, and subsequently, opposes the storm god in all its apparitions, i.e. Shaitan against allah, Satan/Lucifer against jehovah, Satan against yhvh. One is able to engage in genuine Diabolic worship of these Beings. Demonological suppositional tiers are, in actuality, composed of Entities which transcend specifics of purported mythopoetic negation; the nature of yhvh/allah/jehovah -all which are described faces of the same storm god yet existent within their own formation- belongs to the monotheistic Currents, which are the most authoritarian of nearly all religious impulses. The Natures of Divinity are not precisely the transmitted narratives of the mythos within; Their narratives are both within and without; Their implications and synthesized variants, and their precise mythos attesting to a form of singularity and multiplicity. This defines Their existence as a fluid one, in all forms which we cognitively process their Faces. Demons, Princes, Princesses transcend and exist in both form and acausality.

2): Satan exists as a collection of Entities demonized by the monotheists and these Entities also exist within polymorphic multiplicity. Applying and expanding these principles as a universal, this functionally opens the gateways to the Adversarial Paths within the praxis of multitudinous mechanization. In more straight-forward terms, the spiritual politics of the historical world gives the nature of mystical systems its justifiable flexibility. In this manner, all Gods/Anti-Gods belong to the same stratum of supra-Being within Potentia; Satan is both the All-None, the Eternal Void of Nothingness, and that which generates permissible potentiality within the confines of causal relations. Therefore, while yhvh exists as Absolute-God within a realm, through historical archaeology of real-world spiritual realpolitiks, we can see that the absolute-god is a form within a specificity; there are indeed many Absolute-God/Goddesses, many whom have held this title and name and form. And, indeed, it is provable that spiritual politics waged a physical one, clashing between Animalists to the Polytheists to the majoritarian Monotheists, who, given the nature of their focal collectivizaPost too long. Click here to view the full text.